Volume 54, Issue 8 p. 836-846
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Raman spectroscopy of yellow organic pigments of large Korean Buddhist paintings from the late Joseon dynasty (17th–19th centuries)

Na Ra Lee

Na Ra Lee

Conservation Science Division, National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, Daejeon, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Ji Hyeon Yun

Ji Hyeon Yun

Conservation Science Division, National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, Daejeon, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
So Jin Kim

Corresponding Author

So Jin Kim

Conservation Science Division, National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, Daejeon, South Korea

Correspondence

So Jin Kim, Conservation Science Division, National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, Daejeon 34122, South Korea.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 June 2023

Abstract

The yellow coloring of the organic and inorganic pigments used in large Buddhist paintings during the late Joseon dynasty (17th–19th centuries) is herein analyzed using Raman spectroscopy and non-invasive component analysis via p-XRF. p-XRF analyses of 194 yellow points on 12 large Buddhist paintings confirmed the use of gold, orpiment, and organic pigments; however, the yellow chromophoric elements of the organic pigments were not detected. The confirmed colors ranged from light yellow (close to white) to bright and dark yellow, but microscopic analysis revealed no particles or crystals. Accurate identification of pigments comprising light elements or organic compounds is challenging, which limits their identification via p-XRF. In contrast, Raman spectroscopy of the samples presumed to be organic pigments detected gamboge in the samples, either alone, mixed with a white inorganic pigment such as lead white to express yellow, or overlaid upon such a pigment. These results demonstrate the utility of Raman spectroscopy in the analysis of organic pigments and provide a guide for the identification of coloring materials used in cultural heritage artifacts.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.